Responsible tourism in Antarctica
Antarctica is the only continent without a government – and this has seemingly fostered a sense of shared responsibility for the earth’s last true wilderness. While several nations have sketched wedge-shaped slices onto maps of the ice sheet, claiming them for their own, the Antarctic Treaty, signed in 1959, agreed that no claims would be recognised, ending the threat of conflict over this uninhabitable land. Military and mining activities are prohibited in the treaty, yet as a “scientific preserve”, Antarctica is open to those wishing to carry out research.
In a rather utopian vision of cooperation and environmental concern, annual meetings between the countries discuss scientific collaborations, the threats facing the continent and how to manage the growing tourism industry. This government-free land ironically seems to be one of the best managed in the world. It has never experienced war, and its delicate environment is wholly protected – an unprecedented step. Any travellers to Antarctica will be made aware of the fragility of the polar ecosystems, as one of the privileged few to set foot on the earth’s final frontier.
Wildlife & environment
Should I visit Antarctica?When it comes to responsible tourism in Antarctica, many environmentalists would argue that the only truly green course of action is... not to go. In many long-haul destinations, responsible tourism can play a huge role in community development and conservation which we believe offsets the environmental cost of flying – but with no permanent inhabitants, this is not the case in Antarctica. So – how can the flight be justified?
Although activities south of the polar circle are highly regulated, Antarctica remains at the mercy of activities taking place thousands of miles to the north. The climate crisis is without doubt the biggest threat facing Antarctica. Temperatures have risen here much faster than across the rest of the globe – by almost 3°C in just 50 years.
As the fringes of the continent hover around freezing, these few degrees could mean the difference between ice and no ice – and for wildlife this is a very important difference indeed. Glaciers are rapidly retreating and an estimated 25,000km² of ice has vanished. Rising sea temperatures affect the tiniest of sea creatures such as krill – and effects on their numbers are seen all the way up the food chain to seals and whales.
But while it is true that a flight to Buenos Aires, Ushuaia or Antarctica will contribute to the climate crisis, so will every other flight you take, every car journey you make and every bit of food you eat that has travelled from a distant farm. They all contribute to the melting of polar ice, and they all also contribute to the altered rainfalls, drought and hurricanes across the world as a whole. So it is wrong to link your Antarctic flights exclusively with the melting poles – and it is equally wrong to ignore all the other carbon emissions you create when thinking about how to reduce your impact on Antarctica.
This leads us to the dilemma that every traveller to the poles faces. There is no easy alternative to flying and – unlike other choices we can make in our lives (choosing renewable energy over fossil fuels, Fairtrade over regular coffee, and local over shipped-in food) – there is no magic low carbon aviation fuel available right now.
With a lack of alternatives, it is also remarkable, given the importance of global warming to all our futures, that no effective global mechanism to ensure CO² levels are reduced has ever been implemented. So the choice is left to you as a personal one: to go or not to go?
What you can do
"Seeing a place free of pollution, garbage and hunters was fantastic and helped shape my opinions on environmentalism" – Stephen Kohn, from our holiday reviews
Most of our customers who have travelled to Antarctica have described themselves as deeply moved by its peace and pristine landscapes. Climate change, nature’s fragility and the urgency of protecting it suddenly hit home, and an expedition to Antarctica really can prove to be life-changing. In a land where there are no local voices to shout about their cause, tourists have an important role to play as representatives and ambassadors for this final wilderness.
If you do decide to go to Antarctica, perhaps the question is: what changes can you make in your life to reduce your carbon footprint and lobby for effective global regulation of carbon?
Our Antarctica Holidays
The International Association of Antarctic Tour OperatorsAntarctica’s biggest industry is tourism, with over 56,000 visitors per year, some 10,000 of whom will only cruise or fly without setting foot on land. Currently, most of this tourism is concentrated in just 2 percent of the Antarctic – the Antarctic Peninsula – and is spread over just five months of the year, so effects on the environment and wildlife are unavoidable.
The International Association of Antarctic Tour Operators (IAATO) was created in 1991 to represent operators offering Antarctic tours. Working alongside the Antarctic Treaty, IAATO promotes safe, respectful travel in the region, with strictly enforced codes of conduct to avoid causing any damage to the environment. Member operators must comply with these regulations in an effort to preserve the landscape that their passengers are travelling so far to see.
What you can do
Ensure your tour operator is registered with IAATO (all of our partners who run our holidays are) and most of the work is done for you. They should send you comprehensive trip notes before your expedition begins – and once on board, guides will explain the various rules and regulations associated with Antarctic travel. Strict as this may sound, most visitors find it fascinating and are keen to do their bit to protect the environment.
Download IAATO’s travel advice for more information.